PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PERBANKAN SYARI’AH DI INDONESIA (KAJIAN TERHADAP KOMPETENSI PERADILAN AGAMA DAN PERADILAN UMUM SETELAH BERLAKUNYA UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 21 TAHUN 2008 TENTANG PERBANKAN SYARI’AH DAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 50 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG PERADILAN AGAMA

Fahmi, Achmad and Chandra, Irawan and Adi , Bastian Salam (2016) PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PERBANKAN SYARI’AH DI INDONESIA (KAJIAN TERHADAP KOMPETENSI PERADILAN AGAMA DAN PERADILAN UMUM SETELAH BERLAKUNYA UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 21 TAHUN 2008 TENTANG PERBANKAN SYARI’AH DAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 50 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG PERADILAN AGAMA. Bengkoelen Justice, 2 (1). pp. 6-38. ISSN 2088-3412

Preview

Archive (Article) Jurnal Ilmiah Fahmi-Candra Irawan-Adibastian.pdf - Bibliography Available under License Creative Commons GNU GPL (Software). Download (2MB) | Preview

Abstract

This study originated from the reality that occurs in a world of justice in Indonesia where it has occurred dualism between the Religious authority prosecute the General Court in Islamic banking disputes. This is (dualism of authority to hear) is caused because of the emergence of Act No. 21 of 2008 concerning Islamic Banking which is directly contrary to the Act No. 3 of 2006 on the Court of Religion that gives the possibility for the General Court to examine and adjudicate disputes other than courts of Islamic banking religion. As a result cause problems. First, how the dispute resolution Shariah banking in Indonesia, second, whether the Religious absolute competence is reduced and/or dualism, and the Third, how competence dispute resolution arrangements to ensure certainty of sharia banking law in Indonesia. The third problem comes after the enactment of Law Number 21 Year 2008 About Banking Shariah and Law Number 50 Year 2009 on the Religious.

Actions (login required)

View Item