KAJIAN YURIDIS PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM PADA PUTUSAN PERKARA NOMOR: 194/PID.B/2022 TENTANG PENGRUSAKAN TANAMAN YANG BERASPEK KEPEMILIKAN TANAH

This research is motivated by the existence of cases of issuing 2 (two) or
more land certificates on the same plot of land, which are often referred to as
overlapping certificates and resulting in legal uncertainty for the holders of the
land rights. The purpose of this research to find out and analyze the Juridical
Study of Judge Considerations in Decision on Case Number: 194/Pid.B/2022
Concerning Destruction of Plants with Land Ownership Aspects. Destruction of
Plants with Land Ownership Aspects and Judge's Decision in Criminal Case
Number: 194/Pid.B/2022 Concerning Plant Destruction with Land Ownership
Aspects in Accordance with the Principles of Justice. This research method uses
normative legal research methods focusing on an inventory of positive law, by
analyzing legal materials qualitatively juridically. The results of the study show
that, First, the basis for the judge's consideration in deciding on the Criminal
Case Number: 194/Pid.B/2022 is to continue to convict the defendants referring
to the facts at trial, both evidence and evidence in accordance with the article that
was violated, namely Article 406 Paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code in
conjunction with Article 55 Paragraph and (1) of the Criminal Code as material
for consideration and guidance in suspending criminal cases but continuing the
criminal case and arriving at a decision by convicting the defendants. Second, the
judge's decision in the criminal case Number: 194/Pid.B/2022 Concerning the
Destruction of Plants with the Aspect of Land Ownership, in fact the panel of
judges did not prioritize the principles of justice in deciding criminal cases. The
judge should have made an interlocutory decision to postpone the criminal case
process until awaiting a civil case because it can be assessed that the ownership
of the object of the land dispute is unclear.